Toytown
File under: urbanism, Wellington
I've been wondering when the houses relocated for the bypass would be re-inhabited, thus bringing some life back to a ravaged district. Surely it wouldn't be long before they were snapped up? But no: Karo Drive and Tonks Grove are going to look like toytown for quite some time to come.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06a7f/06a7ffe4c183d56e6438e8e930a66474b151276d" alt="'Toy houses' in Tonks Grove"
I don't supposed it's occurred to them to offer the buildings for short-term lease in the interim? At a time when residents, artists and small businesses are worrying about being driven out of the city by rising rents, both Transit and the city could benefit from making use of these buildings. They'd need a bit more internal renovation to make them liveable, but surely that's preferable to leaving these houses as sadly empty as they were when the bypass opened.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bdf4/6bdf460514da0efa3ac0e63552d8b60366c748c6" alt="Acai House, Footscray Ave, Te Aro"
It all goes to show that for all the talk by the bypass' backers that the project was above "improving" Te Aro, they either never cared or never understood what cities are really about. It's not a fresh coat of paint and a few token plants that make a city, but people. When these cottages were falling to pieces, the bypassers were quick to talk about "blight", but to me it's a lot more "blighted" now that it's empty. It's the same with the post-bypass modifications to Ghuznee St, since while all the actual highway building was completed on or ahead of schedule, Ghuznee St is still a scruffy building site despite all the work being scheduled for completion last month. Never mind the rhetoric about improving the city: once the drivers get their way, everything else is an afterthought at best.
12 Comments:
Another year??! Another year until the open wound from the bypass surgery will be stitched up? That's too mucking long. If they could manage monthly leases for the affected buildings years before the carnage, what's stopping them now? Is it because Rex Nicholls doesn't want competition for business while he's filling his Lego block?
You're not making it very tempting to come back Tom. :(
It's okay to come back, Ben! Just don't wander around the very top of Cuba St and expect it to look good.
I don't supposed it's occurred to them to offer the buildings for short-term lease in the interim?
If it has, they will well remember how all-but impossible it was to evict the tenants that were in them before needing to move the houses for the bypass.
Some of those evictions were dragged out for years by the tenants.
Tom - where did you get the first image in this post? Are there more?
M-D: I took it on Saturday, then did the old fake-depth-of-field thing in Photoshop to make it look even more like toytown ;-) I've got several more originals, if you'd like to see them.
I'd wondered if it was in-camera or post-processing - I think a series of them would be great given the nature of developments in that area.
Do you have them on your Flickr account?
Nonsense, most tenants left when they were told, and those that remained on the whole did not last much longer. Perhaps you are thinking of Mike Murray at 289 Cuba Street? As far as I can recall, an isolated case my anonymous friend.
The area has been lobotomised into a fake and soul-less 'heritage' museum, terminally unimaginative and devoid of any human aspect. (does this sound like anyone we know?)
"they will well remember how all-but impossible it was to evict the tenants that were in them before needing to move the houses for the bypass."
Rubbish. The vast majority of these houses were sitting empty for years (decades in some cases) before construction started. Transit owned most of them and let them fall apart through lack of maintenance, then pointed to their run down state as a reason for putting the road through.
Transit deliberatly degraded what had been a thriving area around upper Cuba Street to reduce opposition to the bypass. A classic case of using money and power to trump democracy.
- Sam Buchanan
As I understand it, there are legal reasons why you can't lease out surplus PWA buildings while you're looking for their previous owners. Something to do with not affecting the interests of who they might go back to.
That's a pity: I hate to see narrow legalities and the interests of former owners (who may or may not want them anyway) ahead of the life of the city. Transit must have known about that sort of thing years ago, any if they'd actually cared about what happened to the buildings, it could all have been sorted by now.
Post a Comment
<< Home